Business applications
Replace disconnected spreadsheets and manual handoffs with role-based applications that reflect how your teams work.
Pact Integration helps businesses design and build bespoke web applications, SaaS products and internal tools. We focus on understanding the workflows, users, integrations and operational constraints before choosing an architecture.
Replace disconnected spreadsheets and manual handoffs with role-based applications that reflect how your teams work.
Validate a focused product scope, design the critical flows, and build a foundation you can extend as you learn from users.
Connect CRMs, ERPs, databases, payment services and third-party APIs while keeping records consistent across systems.
Improve maintainability, performance and security without forcing an unnecessary all-at-once rewrite.
We usually begin with discovery: existing processes, success criteria, constraints, and integration points. From there we propose milestones, technical decisions, testing coverage and deployment responsibilities. Scope and fees depend on the actual requirements, not a generic package.
Build when core workflows, data relationships, integrations or permissions cannot be handled reliably by existing products without expensive workarounds. Buy or configure when a standard tool already solves the problem well. A discovery stage should compare both options before development begins.
Self-service requests, permissions, status tracking and integration with internal systems.
Approvals, order tracking, reporting and role-based business processes.
MVP architecture, subscription-ready foundations, admin capabilities and an iteration plan.
These are illustrative service capabilities and design patterns, not claims that a named client project has already been delivered.
It can cover workflow discovery, UX planning, backend and frontend engineering, database design, API integration, testing, deployment and maintenance. The scope depends on what users must accomplish, how data moves and which systems need to connect.
Cost depends on functionality, user roles, integrations, data migration, security needs, quality requirements and maintenance. A useful estimate starts with a documented MVP and explicit assumptions, rather than a fixed price based only on a short feature list.
The timeline depends on the number and complexity of workflows, the availability of APIs and data, approvals, and feedback cycles. We would first define one release goal and acceptance criteria before offering a project-specific estimate.
Often yes when the system offers suitable APIs, database access or agreed import/export formats. Integration planning should consider authentication, data ownership, retries, reconciliation and how failures are surfaced to users.
Ownership, repository access, deployment credentials, source-code handover, documentation and support should be explicitly agreed in the engagement terms before work starts. These decisions are as important as the technical stack.
Tell us what needs to change, which systems are involved and what success looks like. We can discuss the approach and an appropriate next step.
Tell us about your project ↗